The chaotic order is intended. Some completion algorithms tend to sort
their results by modification time or something similar.
The "huge" number of directories is also intended. With more items the
chance is higher to hit a bug if no sorting took place.
Since Zsh just completes non-empty directories, some files have to be
created, too.
Even if there is a directory in the current working directory with the
same name as a command, the directory must not be completed.
So, if we want to complete "true" and there is a directory "true" in the
current working directory, the completion list has to be just {"true"},
not {"true", "true/"}, or anything else!
In some circumstances, if not every syscall was somehow redefined, the
directory was not changed correctly. With luafilesystem.chdir it is
assured that we are in the wanted directory afterwards.
Since busted seems to spawn isolated child processes for every test
suite, the temporary PATH directories have to be created at the
beginning and destroyed at the end of a test suite.
We cannot possibly know what is in the PATH of a user. The completion
test cases however assume that there is nothing else in the PATH that
starts with `true` other than `true` itself.
These two methods create or respectively destroy a temporary PATH
directory especially for testing. We can put commands in there via
symlinks and verify the correct functionality of the complete commands.
The PATH environment variable is set and reset via GLib.
This tests are not-really-good because they are overly specific. They
test for the current behaviour of the implementation, but I guess that a
valid implementation could also behave slightly different. However, for
now this will have to be enough.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This adds new code so that we can count how often a specific widget is
visible inside of all widget hierarchies.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
* Move table functions out of awful.util into new gears.table
* travis: Use v9999 prefix for full requests
Make sure no newly deprecated functions are used
* Move all `awful.util.table.*` calls to `gears.table.*` calls
Move table test functions from awful/util_spec to new gears/table_spec
Change awful.util.subsets call to gears.math.subsets in awful/key.lua
This extracts the code for finding the next screen
from focus_bydirection to a separate method on
the screen object.
The main reason was to use the finding code without
actually changing the screen focus but this should
incidentally make the code slightly easier to test
as well since both concerns can be tested in
isolation.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Mertz <chris@nimel.de>
For loading a theme, beautiful.init() has to be called. We do not handle
dynamic changes of the theme, so if the theme is changed after something
was already queried, this change will not apply. This also means that
before the theme is loaded, nothing useful can be returned. In fact,
code that tries to access the theme during require() will never get a
useful value from beautiful, but just nils.
To catch this, one Travis build is modified so that an error is raised
if the theme is accessed before beautiful.init() was called.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
- Execute the tests without compiling, and don't mess with the source
files when coverage is enabled.
This ensures that the coverage report lines are correct.
This disables the doc tests, as their results would be unused.
Hack: it still expands macros on util.lua, because of
`util.get_themes_dir()` and `util.get_awesome_icon_dir()`, which might
be moved later. Ref:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/1239#discussion_r93828178.
- ensure that BUILD_APIDOC and DO_COVERAGE are not used together
- awesomeConfig.cmake: add DO_COVERAGE as an option
- Travis: only install codecov with DO_COVERAGE=codecov
- Travis: do not use set -v; use set -x with DO_COVERAGE
- do not use trailing slashes with dirs in tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt / .luacov
- Use latest luacov (0.12.0-1) again
This reverts parts of 4cc6a815.
I think it is better to fix any failure that 4cc6a815 tried to work around.
- Travis: simplify/fix require('luacov') for functionaltests
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: resolve ../.. in SOURCE_DIR
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: add DO_COVERAGE to env
- Cleanup/simplify .luacov: work with SOURCE_DIRECTORY alone
- tests/run.sh: pass through / set SOURCE_DIRECTORY when running awesome
- tests/run.sh: resolve source_dir
- use DO_COVERAGE from env only
We already have a variant of this function for transforming an actual
matrix. This adds the corresponding static factory.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Matrix operations are hard. Apparently I always keep confusing the order
that transformations are applied in the matrix resulting from a matrix
multiplication.
This commit fixes things in wibox.hierarchy that were wrong due to the
wrong order and changes a unit test so that it would now catch the
breakage (and makes sure that it does not happen again).
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The requirement to call add_signal() was added to catch typos. However, this
requirement became increasingly annoying with property::<name> signals and e.g.
gears.object allowing arbitrary properties to be changed.
All of this ended up in a single commit because tests/examples fails if I first
let add_signal() emit a deprecation warning.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The problem was that get_square_distance() made the screen one pixel larger to
the bottom/right than it really was. Thus, the (x+0,y+0)-pixel of a screen that
was below or to the right of some other screen had distance zero to both of
these screens.
This commit fixes the screen size computation and adds a small unit test for
getbycoord() and get_square_distance().
Reported by Elv13 here:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/878#issuecomment-219272864
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This library is a wrapper around pcall() / xpcall() that prints an error message
via gears.debug.print_error() in case of errors.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This adds a test that checks that :setup{ false } filters out the false, just
like it already filters out nil values. Then, this also adds a test that checks
that properties (:setup{ foo = false }) are not filtered out, because the first
version of me check did that accidentally.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>