This is basically an initial stab for some modules and some
experimenting with the `@classmod` directive.
For most of the docs only basic transforming was done.
At the moment the tooltip module looks the best.
Signed-off-by: Ignas Anikevicius (gns_ank) <anikevicius@gmail.com>
That commit made awful.tag use timer.delayed_call() to call withcurrent() during
the manage signal. The idea was "if nothing else assigns any tags until the end,
apply some default ones".
However, the C core refuses to set the input focus to an unviewable client and
thus this means that setting the input focus during manage failed. So, instead
of using the delayed_call(), just call withcurrent() directly, like we did
before.
However, some part of that commit is still left: Awful.rules no longer
disconnects the withcurrent() callback from the "manage" signal. This was
originally added in commit 5e7ddd1efa, because it clients flickered otherwise if
they were moved to some unselected tag during "manage". This happened because
the C code unbanned the client when it got assigned the input focus and only
later did some other code move it to some unselected tag.
However, this flickering will no longer occur, because commit 3dbf89c990 added
lazy focus setting. Thanks to this, setting the focus no longer unbans a client
as a side-effect. Thus, if you focus a client and then remove it from all
selected tags, nothing will be visible on-screen.
To make a long story short: This commit reverts the part of commit 90fde1393f
which caused side effects. The part that wasn't necessary any more is left in.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This way this function runs after everything else did its job. The client will
only get assigned a tag after everything else had a chance to do so.
Thanks to this, awful.rules no longer has to disconnect the call to withcurrent.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
* Move the "index" setting burden to individual functions
instead of gettags().
* Add some properties earlier so the signal hooks will be called
with valid data.
Setting a tag's screen to what it already is shouldn't have any bad effects.
However, this code messed up the tag order and selection status.
Fix this by returning early if the tag already has the right screen.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Since commit 9c69e857ed, awful.tag.setscreen() unsets a tag's index to make
sure things end up in a sane order on the new screen. Thus, the call to
setscreen() removed the "index" property that tag.move just set.
Fix this by setting the index after the screen.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This makes the screen objects use our existing infrastructure for implementing
classes and objects with lua instead of hand-rolling an own version.
This results in some small API change: Screen objects no longer have an
add_signal() function and instead this function exists on the parent screen
class.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The bugs this fix are:
* Invalid request using nil as screen
* Stop messing indexes in the old screen
* Prevent c.screen <-> t.screen mismatch
* Prevent no tags being selected in the old screen
When a screen doesn't have any tags selected, then just tag the new client with
all of the screen's tags. That way, we don't lose clients.
Also, if we failed at coming up with tags for a client, don't completely untag
it. This means that it can keep its old tags if it had any.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commit partly reverts commit b4c83d0e70.
Because the C code emits property::screen before manage, this caused
awful.tag.withcurrent() to run on a client before it really was being managed.
This then tagged the client. Because of this tag changes, awful.layout reacted
and ran the layout code. Because c.type wasn't set up at this point yet, the
client wasn't considered to be floating yet. This caused the client's geometry
to change and thus its floating geometry was messed up.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
By default, tag.history.restore switches between the previous history
states, which is not what should get done when deleting a tag.
Without this, deleting multiple tags in a row, will jump back to the
first/fallback tag, instead of the older history entries.
Restoring a previous history entry changes the tag history (in the
meaning of currently selected tags), and therefore should also emit the
tag::history::update signal.
A use case might be to automatically hide tags with no clients on them.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hahler <git@thequod.de>
Instead of having the C code mess with which tags are selected, we now emit a
signal on the tag that says that something requested it to be selected. Lua can
then handle this by only switching tags on the correct monitor and by updating
the focus history correctly.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The documentation says that screen, the last argument to viewmore(), is an
optional argument. However, the implementation only treated it as an optional
argument in one place.
Fix this by always setting the screen variable itself to a screen.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The activated property was added to tag objects between awesome 3.4 and 3.5.
This is used in the C code to keep tags alive even when nothing else refers to
it and includes a tag e.g. in some root window properties.
Thus, to get rid of a tag and to make the C code drop its reference to it, we
have to set activated to false in this function.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When awesome restarts because a new screen was added or removed, clients can end
up being on a different screen than before the restart. However, the tags will
be carried across the restart. This means that a client could end up being
tagged with a tag from another screen. This results in weird behavior of tag
switches and confuses users.
To work around this, remove the client from any tags that are on a different
screen during startup. If the client ends up without any tags, it will then be
tagged with the currently selected tags.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Since commit d8a93dafa3, tags have an "index" property which decides about
the order in which they are displayed in the taglist. If a tag doesn't have this
property set, the next call to awful.tag.gettags() will fix this and "invent" an
index for this new tag.
However, if multiple tags didn't have an "index" property, gettags() would
assign all of them the same index. The following call to table.sort() would then
do random magic to these tags (remember: table.sort() is not a stable sorting
algorithm, so it is allowed to randomly swap around entries which have the same
sorting key).
Fix this by making sure that the new "index" properties are different from each
other.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Signals are emitted on individual objects and on the class for a while now. This
can be used to simplify this function a lot.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This makes tag.viewidx take a screen index rather than a screen object,
complying with its doc string. This fixes#963.
Signed-off-by: Felix Bier <flx.bier@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Tagging sticky clients shouldn't hurt anything, but it helps a lot if the client
later becomes unsticky. I'd have no tags in that case.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This option is no longer valid in modelines, so it has been removed from
all modelines using the following shellscript:
#!/bin/ksh
git ls-tree -r HEAD | cut -f2 | while read f; do
egrep -e '^(//|--) vim: .*encoding=' $f >/dev/null || continue
sed -E -e '/^(\/\/|--) vim:/s/:encoding=utf-8//' $f > /tmp/foo
mv /tmp/foo $f
done
Signed-off-by: Gregor Best <gbe@ring0.de>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>