Reported on IRC. I am not sure why swap() is not enough, but the
old code removed before the mouse refactor did this, so apparently
it is necessary.
The fix has been reported to work by spyroboy on IRC, thanks!
The requirement to call add_signal() was added to catch typos. However, this
requirement became increasingly annoying with property::<name> signals and e.g.
gears.object allowing arbitrary properties to be changed.
All of this ended up in a single commit because tests/examples fails if I first
let add_signal() emit a deprecation warning.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
to reproduce:
1) spawn an xterm
2) enter 'sleep 10 && killall xterm'
3) start moving the terminal
There will be an error
(found by a yet to be commited integration test)
If a screen is removed while a re-layout is pending, previously this code would
cause errors and problems. Since the screen is gone, there is nothing to arrange
anyway and we can just not do anything.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Any signal on a screen instance is also emitted on the screen class, so the here
can just connect to the screen class.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
There seem to be a little race condition (either in my layout code or
elsewhere) when playing with multiple screens. As most properties do
not depend on the tag, there is no point in returning early anyway.
Because all our Lua code can now work with screen objects, most of the uses of
s.index that the previous patches added for reaching this goal can be removed
again.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commits makes a random selection of modules in awful support screen objects
and accept them as parameters everywhere where a screen index is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
awful.layout.suit.corner does awful.tag.getmfpol(t), but doesn't actually have a
variable t in scope. I just copied the needed stuff from the tile layout.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It is necessary to have it beforehand when creating layout objects
for unselected layouts.
In the current layout system, there is no layout object, but to allow
tabs and dynamic tagging features like ion3, layouts cannot be stateless.
This allow layout "arrange" to be called less often and react on
the cause of the change itself rather than it's consequences
(usually, the "focus" signal).
Previously, the layout were re-arranged everytime the focus changed.
Now, with "raised" and "lowered", it require less "arrange".
"swapped" allow smarted layouts. Currently, swapped cause a full
re-arrange. It re-read the "index" list from scratch and create
a "new" layout. With "swapped", incremental layout changes are
possible.
Fixes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/616
18f6ab1 changed the behavior when resizing floating clients using the
mouse (via modkey + RMB).
Previously, you could initiate the mousegrabber using e.g. "modkey +
RMB", release the key and button, and resize the window using the left
mouse button.
This restores this behavior by canceling the mousegrabbers only if the
cursor was moved, without _any_ mouse button being pressed.
Fixes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/309.
Closes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/310.
This still does `client.focus = c` by default, but allows to customize
it.
This was initially suggested in #194, but by using `request::activate`
instead, which would not be the same. Therefore a new signal is being
used instead.
Helped-by: Samir Benmendil <samir.benmendil@gmail.com>
In commit 3cbdc2a79f, the argument order for awful.layout.inc was changed
from (layouts, i, s) to (i, s, layouts), so that layouts can become an optional
parameter. However, this change (obviously) breaks user configs.
To hide this breakage, we assume the old argument order if the number i is a
table. This cannot break anything, since the operator "+" will error out on
tables anyway. :-)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Uli Schlachter
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Daniel Hahler
Daniel Hahler
actionless
Julian Wollrath