alloca() allocates stack space. The image that we were producing is possibly
huge which means that we were asking for e.g. 9MiB of stack space. This is not
really a good idea and caused crashes.
Fix this by using heap memory instead.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Function imlib_create_cropped_image() from imlib2 doesn't initialize
buffer for new image, so if we use crop bounds bigger than original ones
we need to erase garbage from derived image.
This bug produced colorful pressed buttons (FS#516, FS#822).
Signed-off-by: Roman Kosenko <madkite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
If we called the widget layout for x widgets, but the layouts returned less
geometries than this, we silently ignored the left-over widgets. If the layouts
returned more geometries, we crashed.
Fix this by verifying that the number of widgets and the number of geometries
are equal. If they are different, we use the smaller of the two.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
While drawing the wibox, the C core builds up a list of widgets and their
associated geometry. This list consists of widget_node_t objects and is
constructed like this (This is from luaA_table2widgets()):
widget_node_t w;
p_clear(&w, 1);
w.widget = luaA_object_ref_item(L, idx, -1);
widget_node_array_append(widgets, w);
After we are done with this list of widget nodes, it is freed via
wibox_widget_node_array_wipe(). However, wibox_widget_node_array_wipe() passed
"&w" to luaA_object_unref_item() while it should have used "w.widget" (which is
what was returned from luaA_object_ref_item()). This made the unref fail and the
wibox was carrying around a reference to this widget forever. This was
effectively a memory leak.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When setting a new widgets table, the wibox obviously should drop its reference
on the old widgets table.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The only string format for colors that we now support are #rrggbb and #rrggbbaa.
All other strings will cause errors.
Thanks to this, color_init_cookie_t can be removed. There won't be a request to
the X server for transforming named colors any more and so there won't be a
cookie. This means that color_init_reply() has to be removed, too.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The systray bases its extents on the size of the wibox that it is contained in.
No idea how this is supposed to work when the systray doesn't get the full size,
but in a vertical wibox, using <height of wibox> * <number of icons in systray>
certainly doesn't work for computing the size.
The fix isn't hard: Check the wibox' orientation when drawing and base our
calculation on its width if its orientation is different from East.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commit makes it an error if an unknown signal is connected, disconnected or
emitted. All signals have to be added before they can be used.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This reverts commit 27f9c0177a.
This commit broke code like the following because reading client.focus would
still return the previously focused client:
awful.client.focus.byidx(1)
if client.focus then client.focus:raise() end
This moves the appropriate fields for client focus from screen_t to globalconf
since only the first screen's fields were used anyway.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This makes awesome support only a single X11 protocol screen. If you are still
using zaphod mode, you can run multiple instances of awesome on the single
screens, e.g.:
DISPLAY=:1.0 awesome & DISPLAY=:1.1 awesome &
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Previously, if a client had nofocus == true, it wasn't unminimized if sth tried
to focus it. Also, if this client had the WM_TAKE_FOCUS protocol, the focusing
would fail since it's an error to set the input focus to an unviewable window.
For consistency, this also moves the code that sets a client's minimized
property to false into client_unban() since it doesn't make sense to have a
minimized client unbanned (i.e. visible).
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
If this property is true, setting "client.focus" to this client might have some
effect. If it is false, setting "client.focus" will be ignored completely.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The old code used the wrong constants which meant we always returned "word" for
wrap and "end" for ellipsize.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Previous, there was a round-trip after each request for a property since we
waited for the reply immediately. Instead, it makes a lot more sense to first
send all of the requests and then handle all the replies. This now takes only a
single round-trip for all the properties from client_update_properties().
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of calling each property handler with a property reply, it's now up to
the handlers to request the properties.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
For each property we handle, there is now a function which sends a request and
returns the cookie and a second function that takes the cookie and saves the
result in the client_t struct. This should make it possible to improve our
latency later on.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This should fix an actual race condition:
- Client unmaps its window (UnmapNotify for awesome)
- Client maps its window (MapRequest for awesome)
- Due to the UnmapNotify: client_unmanage() runs and reparents the window back
to the root (ReparentNotify)
- Due to the MapRequest: client_manage() runs
- Due to the ReparentNotify: We call client_unmanage() again and now the
client's window is lost.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Uli Schlachter
Roman Kosenko
Julien Danjou