The awful.placement.no_overlap function always looked at the currently
visible clients when placing a new client. This produced a confusing
result when using awful.rules or the sn_rules argument of awful.spawn to
place the client on an unselected tag (the client was placed as if it
would be placed on a currently selected tag; if multiple clients were
placed on the same unselected tag, in many cases they were placed at the
same position, overlapping each other).
Make awful.placement.no_overlap check tags of the placed client and
handle the case of placement on an unselected tag in a more useful way:
- If the client is sticky or at least one of the client tags is
selected, keep the previous behavior: avoid overlap with all other
floating clients which are currently visible, and use the currently
active layout to determine the floating status.
An explicit check based on `c:tags()` is made instead of using
`c:isvisible()`, so that the previous behavior is kept even if the
client is hidden or minimized for some reason.
- If all client tags are unselected, avoid overlap with all other
floating clients which either are sticky or share at least one tag
with the placed client, and use the layout of the first tag of the
placed client to determine the floating status.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <sigprof@gmail.com>
A call to cairo_close_path() adds a straight line to the beginning of
the current sub-path. This is used in some of the shapes to, well, close
the shapes.
Sub-paths can be created explicitly via cairo_new_sub_path(), but also
implicitly via cairo_move_to(). When a new sub-path is started, there is
no current point on the path. This means that e.g. cairo_line_to() is in
this start equivalent to cairo_move_to() (= no line is created) and that
cairo_curve_to() first does a cairo_move_to() to the beginning of the
curve. Similarly, cairo_arc() and cairo_arc_negative() first do a
line_to() to the beginning of the arc, and this line_to() can be
implicitly turned into a curve_to().
The problem with the code in gears.shape is that parts of the code
(implicitly) assume that there is not yet any path when the shape
function is called. If this assumption is broken, the call to
close_path() could go to the wrong point, because the path did not start
at the expected position.
Most of the functions in gears.shape already implicitly start a new
sub-path via a call to cairo_move_to(). Those that do not (necessarily)
begin with a call to cairo_move_to() are handled in this commit: They
get an explicit call to cairo_new_sub_path().
This change fixes the issue reported at
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/2804, because the shapes will
no longer be influenced by the pre-existing path. The move_to() that was
left around and caused that issue turns into a degenerate part (it only
has a move_to(), so nothing can be drawn) and is then discarded by
cairo.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Cairo's save/restore methods handle all properties except for the
current path. The path is just left as-is.
A widget's draw method could create some path without consuming it. This
path would then interfere with random things later which did not expect
a path to already exist.
This commits adds calls to cairo_new_path() in the relevant positions to
clean things up.
This not only applies to a widget's draw method, but also
{before,after}_draw_{child,children}. However, these methods could (for
whatever reason) create paths that are to be consumed in one of the
other methods. To keep this working, the path is only cleared after all
of these methods ran.
I do not expect this commit to break anything, because a widget cannot
really assume much about what widget is drawn after it. Especially so,
because partial redraws could mean that some later widget is skipped and
not redrawn.
This should fix the issue reported at
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/2804.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This function checks if a given cairo context has an empty clip. It was
written with the assumption that cairo_clip_extents() produces the x, y,
width, height of the clip extents. However, that function actually
produces x1, y1, x2, y2, where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the corners of
the rectangles.
Due to the way the function is written, it will return non-zero numbers
when there is a translation (cr:translate()). Thus, this function worked
basically never.
Fix this by checking if both points have the same X- or Y-coordinate.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
With draw_empty=false, :fit() can return 0,0. Then, when :layout() is
called, it will compute negative widths and heights. This can then cause
lots of problems later on.
Avoid this by having :layout() return nothing instead of producing
negative sizes.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2799
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Also document the `test` property as deprecated. It exists because the
older API (`naughty.notify`) had it. It exists on purpose in the
rewrite, it cannot just be removed even if it was never in a release.
This will be shared by the notifications stored in a wibox/wibar and the
ones using a popup. It extends the constraint and margins container
to take care of some boilerplate code. While other widgets have their
own public API, those 2 are private since they are not different enough
to warrent a new public module.
There is some boilerplate code that make using the widget_template
harder when using the raw `wibox.container.background`. This widget
takes care of it.
It is a normal textbox with some extra boilerplate code. Having this
in a separate widget allows the notification to be defined from rc.lua
without a ton of beautiful options and connect_signal.
This way their name doesn't get mangle by the broken magic. It will also
eventually allow to `error()` in the template when the implicit
`@function` is used.
This commit also fixes a large number of issues found while
proof-reading everything.
ldoc has a magical `@classmod` module type which tries to detect
what is a method and what is a static function. It fails about as
often as it works. This commit makes everything explicit to remove
such issues.
Fixes#2640
Ref #1373
- Fill slider bar with a linear pattern based on current value (if `bar_active_color` and `bar_color` are correctly provided)
- Add examples for the apidoc
Even thought `awful.key` handles optional "release" parameter well,
parameters are also get used before passing them. In case (only)
optional "data" is provided, it faulty gets called on a release event.
* Add a request to handle the wallpaper when a screen is added or
resized.
* Add a request for screen decorations such as bars or gizmos when
a screen is added.
Both are also sent when a new handler is connected.
* naughty.legacy: Fix a regression caused by a prior fix.
The title was only set "later" because it was called too early.
The intended result was to prevent the code from being executed when
there is no leagcy popup, but it had this side effect.
* naughty.dbus: Expose the new "private" methods so they can be tested.
Because it now uses Gio instead of capi.dbus, it isn't possible to
just shim the backend anymore.
* shims: Upgrade the dbus shims to also emulate some Gio behavior.
As usual, it is the most basic version that produces the correct
result. It doesn't try to comply to the real API.
Previously, it would use the "real" args passed to the constructor.
It was a bad decision since:
* It doesn't allow the tag/tasklist to add properties internally
* It forces the widget to be created with a constructor rather than
the alternate declarative syntax
* It doesn't allow a tag/tasklist to be part of a widget_template
Technically this is a behavior change, but I doubt anybody will notice
given it is a dark and little documented corner of the API. Chances are
nobody have been using this API for years.
With this helper, it becomes possible to avoid manually setting common
properties such as the client in the tasklist of tag in the taglist when
the children widgets of the template have a set_+property_name.
This decision was taken out of necessity. While adding more style
elements to `awful.widget.common` isn't something I want, there is
little else to do here. The problem is that popup based lists only
have size constraints in one direction. So without a way to limit
the icon size, it will take 9999 pixels.
It makes some code easier to write. It is mostly useful when the margins
are exposed through another widget. In that case it avoids having to
proxy 5 different property or re-invent the wheel there.
Previously, the border "support" was limited to shapes and would not
move the content by the offset of the border. Borders are now better
supported and thus renamed from `shape_border_width` to `border_width.
In the end, shrinking the widget by the border size is too common to
ignore. It should have been the default all along, just like the clip.
Instead of having the default template hardcoded as code, this turns the
template into a descriptive version. This makes it easier to come up
with own templates: Just copy the default template and make a slight
change to it.
No functional changes are intended, but I cannot rule out that I did no
mistakes.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
LGI truncates GVariant bytestring instances at the first embedded \0
byte when using .value for "unwrapping". This commit works around that
problem by avoiding the .value API for accessing the image data [0].
Thanks a lot to Will Dietz for finding this problem and for providing a
preliminary patch fixing the problem. That saved me a lot of time [1].
[0]: https://github.com/pavouk/lgi/pull/223
[1]: eecdeb7d46
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This starts the switch from our own, semi-broken DBus bindings to using
the sane bindings that Gio provides.
Part-of: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1093
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
* Fixed input_passthrough property not being set
In the table of properties supplied to the `wibox` function, you couldn't set the `input_passthrough` property. You could only set it after the wibox was created like this: `my_shlick_wibox.input_passthrough = true`. This commit fixes that and now you can set it in both ways.
When you call `reset_timeout` on a notification with 0 timeout and thus no timer, a nil field error occures.
(can be tested with `awesome-client 'require"naughty".notification{message="TEST",timeout=0}:reset_timeout()'`)
Everywhere else in similar places (even at the beginning of the `reset_timeout`) the `self.timer` field is checked so i guess it was just forgotten there.
There is not much good reason why this should be required and making it
optional is almost trivial, as this patch shows.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Vishnunarayan K I
Sergey Vlasov
Uli Schlachter
worron
Uli Schlachter
Michael Beaumont
fREW Schmidt
fREW Schmidt
Hùng
zsugabubus
Will Dietz
Will Dietz
mergify[bot]
Adrian Gabriel
Anton Bulakh
Alphonse Mariya