When a screen is in the process of being removed, it is still valid, but
no longer in the global list of screens (globalconf.screens). In this
time frame, trying to swap screens could cause a NULL pointer
dereference.
Fix this by throwing a Lua error in this case instead.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2110
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The screen object can be indexed by strings to find a screen via some
RANDR output name. However, if a string is used which does not
correspond to a known output, the code just falls through to a function
which will complain "string provided, userdata expected".
This commit provides a slightly more useful error message instead.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This function tried to move the client to its new screen based on
shifting around its current geometry. However, it assumed that the
client was actually visible on its current screen, which is not always
the case.
Fix this by just forcing the client into its new screen if our moving
approach does not work.
This also reverts commit d5e365804c which
is no longer necessary. This commit only hid the issue (partly).
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/318
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The code here made sure that clients were not moved outside of the root
window. However, that's not enough, because clients can still end up
inside the root window, but outside of anything that is visible in some
output. Thus, just remove this.
Related-to: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/318
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Aborting the process is sometimes a bit harsh for a failed assertion.
This adds a non-fatal assert() macro called "check()" and uses it in
some places where we might be able to survive the error.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
We were only using this for tag names. This means we are assuming that
everything is UTF8, but tag names are provided in the local locale and
need to be translated into UTF8? That makes no sense, so just drop this.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1753
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Every call to client_ignore_enterleave_events() must be paired with a
following call to client_restore_enterleave_events(). In between these
two calls, no other calls to client_ignore_enterleave_events() is
allowed.
The code in banning_refresh() sometimes broke these rules. This can
happen because the code causes signals to be emitted and Lua code can do
basically anything.
Fix this by moving the calls into the called functions.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1746
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
I failed to see the obvious. Thanks to mlen from IRC to make
me look into i3's source code so that I can figure out the obvious.
First, what is the problem? We want to be informed about mouse clicks on
client windows, e.g. for client-to-focus. For this we have to grab mouse
buttons on the client window, since only a single client at a time can
ask for information about all mouse clicks (I think...) and that right
is reserved for the actual application and not the WM.
We also want to be informed about mouse clicks on the titlebar, so that
clicking there actually does something (and also e.g. click-to-focus).
Obviously, we can just grab mouse buttons on the titlebar as well.
However, this causes lots of problems. The X11 window containing the
titlebar is not just the size of the titlebar, but also includes all of
the actual client window. This means that clicking into the client also
activates our button grab on the titlebar. This, in turn, causes the
input focus to briefly shift to the window for the titlebar. This shift
of focus can be detected by clients and caused various issues.
This fix is so obvious that I missed it. We don't have to grab buttons
on the titlebar window. We can just use the "normal" event propagation
without grabs there, i.e. we just include the event masks for button
press and button release and get informed about all mouse events. In
fact, we already have this event mask in place, so the whole use of
grabs is redundant.
That's what this commit does. It also partially reverts commit
394ff06589 which is where this unnecessary grabbing was introduced.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1479
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1658
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commit changes the systray widget, wibox.drawable and the C code to
fix the following bug: When the systray widget is removed from a
drawable without being moved somewhere else, the systray stayed visible.
This was because the systray is not drawn by awesome, but only placed.
When the widget is no longer "drawn", it stays wherever it was placed
last.
This change works by detecting the situation when the systray is
removed. Then, the C code is specifically told to remove the systray
window from the drawable.
Note that this is only a partial fix. This change works correctly when
the widget is removed completely, because it is no longer placed by its
parent widget. However, for example, when you do
wibox.widget.systray().visible = false, the effect is just that the
systray widget gets size 0x0. This is not really visible, but as far as
this change is concerned, the widget is still part of the drawable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This adds c.icon_sizes which is a table containing the width and height
of each available icon. With c:get_icon(i), Lua can query the i-th icon
as a lightuserdata.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Clients can provide various icons in their _NET_WM_ICON property. Up to
now we only saved a single one, now we save all of them.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Without RandR telling us what the primary screen is, we just pick the
first one. However, the code here did not emit the right signal.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Before this commit, do this:
c.maximize_hoizontal = true
c.maximize = true
c.maximize = false
assert(c.maximize_hoizontal)
Would not work because the states were not preserved individually.
This commit fixes that. Awesome wont be confused about it's own
state anymore.
This may seem pointless, but when it come to undoing these
maximizations, it was ambiguous.
Before 4.0, maximizing could only be done in 2 operations.
4.0 add an unified way, but kept doing 2 operations. The old
Lua EWMH code to serialize the 2 operations was dropped when
the codepath was simplified and replaced by a generic version
in awful.placement. However this version never implemented
combining multiple mementos into 1.
This commit unify the maximize C code, drop the ugly macro
template and actually fixes a couple more issues that were
caused because request::geometry was sent twice.
I explicitly did not add client_shape_input property since querying the
input shape of the client window seems useless to me.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
These warnings might help catching some problems in the future. These
could be asserts, but printing a warning is a lot nicer than dying.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
X11 does not allow to resize a window to size 0x0. Also, there are some
possibilities of integer overflows in our case. We tried to handle this
already, but there was a loop-hole: If the too-small-value is only
produced after applying size hints, then this was not caught.
Fix this by applying size hints before checking if the resulting size is
valid. However, this means some check needs to be duplicated to handle
the possibility of integer underflows while applying size hints.
Helps-with: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1340
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
We have many places where we are sending an XCB request and expect an
answer where the protocol guarantees that no error can occur and we are
sure to get an answer. However, for example if the X11 server crashes,
these places can still fail. This commit tries to handle failures at all
these places.
I went through the code and tried to add missing error checking (well,
NULL-pointer-checking) to all affected places.
In most cases these errors are just silently ignored. The exception is
in screen querying during startup. If, for example, querying RandR info
fails, we will fall back to Xinerama or zaphod mode. This is serious
enough that it warrants a warning. In most cases, we should exit shortly
afterwards anyway, because, as explained above, these requests should
only fail when our connection to the X11 server breaks.
References: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1205#issuecomment-265869874
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Similarly to what we do with the client list, this signal is emitted
whenever the list of screens changes.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The code in luaA_client_swap() is incorrect, because
luaA_object_emit_signal() already pops the arguments to the signal.
Still, the code here tried to remove the arguments from the Lua stack
again, thereby corrupting the stack (removing more items than there are
in the stack).
Normally, popping more things from the stack than it has entries
silently corrupts the Lua stack. Apparently this doesn't necessarily
cause any immediate issues, because this code has been broken since nine
months and no one noticed. This mistakes was introduced in commit
55190646.
This issue was only noticed by accident. Thus, this commit also adds a
small integration test that exercises this bug. This test catches the
issue, but only on Travis, because there we are building our own version
of Lua 5.3 and that one has assertions enabled.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It does not provide much value. The version number is already known to
ldoc globally in the "description" variable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Daniel sees a short flicker of his wallpaper when he closes a client.
This happens because the window is destroyed immediately, but other
clients are re-arranged only shortly later. In the mean time, the X
server updates the display and repaints the root window (= wallpaper
becomes visible).
Work around this by delaying the destruction of frame windows to the end
of the current main loop iteration. This means that we first update the
position of all other windows and later destroy the window that was
actually closed.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Uli Schlachter
Emmanuel Lepage Vallée
Daniel Hahler
Jagannathan Tiruvallur Eachambadi
Uli Schlachter
Luke Bonham
sudo-nice
Holger Schurig
SammysHP
Vitja Makarov
Ingo Bürk
Daniel Hahler