There was already a bug, as self.active_child.visible
was used instead of self.active_child.wibox.visible
This caused some confusion that this attribute was a widget.
It wasn't.
The behavior was changed during the rewrite. This was a mistake
as it was assumed (wrongly) that nobody used this function with
wiboxes other than "wibars" (awful.wibox).
Fixes#917
Since the screen removal patchset, the tags properties were
cleaned too early. This caused code connecting to "property::activated"
to be called with the tag already partially deleted. For code depending
on those properties, such as radical.impl.taglist, this caused errors.
Apparently, there is such thing as not leaking enough...
Also try to clear the widgets from mywibox. This seem to help.
Time will tell.
Fixes#914, unfixes #808
Why:
* Two different (but related) concepts had the same name
* Users were confused for years on IRC
* The wibar name was already in use in some doc to avoid confusion
This was only partially implemented. The margins were substracted from
the area too early in the pipeline. Now, they are added when getting
the size and substracted when setting it. This way, the margins will
"survive" when a placement function set an absolute value in one of
the field. Previously, this caused one (or more) of the margins to
be lost.
The problem was that get_square_distance() made the screen one pixel larger to
the bottom/right than it really was. Thus, the (x+0,y+0)-pixel of a screen that
was below or to the right of some other screen had distance zero to both of
these screens.
This commit fixes the screen size computation and adds a small unit test for
getbycoord() and get_square_distance().
Reported by Elv13 here:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/878#issuecomment-219272864
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Any clients with these tags end up somewhere random (the first tag on the first
remaining screen). This certainly can be improved in the future, but at least
this is a start.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When this force-argument is not given, the code will refuse to delete a tag
which has a non-sticky client. With this force argument, the client will just be
moved to the fallback tag.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This code uses delayed calls to lazily update things. Thanks to this, it can try
to update a screen long after it was removed. Fix this by just doing nothing on
invalid screens.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Daniel Hahler
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
actionless
Uli Schlachter
Daniel Hahler