It should be called "align", but the name is already taken
It doesn't use awful.placement because it would break the dependency
graph.
Some cases previously required 2 wibox.layout.align layouts,
one for each axis. This is massively overkill to simply place
a widget at the center of a larger area.
* refactor(awful: hotkeys_popup): expose configuration options for a widget instance and use more object-oriented structure for the widget
closes#1352closes#1497
* doc(awful: hotkeys_popup): add @beautiful docstrings
* fix(awful: hotkeys_popup): add label_bg for misc labels; improve @beautiful docstrings
This was previously done in a callback, but wasn't really
clean and/or bug free. Borders could end up leaking on other
screens as proven by an integration test.
Fix#171
And stop listening to property::geometry, it's no longer needed.
This also remove messing up the border without saving it
somewhere. The concept is sound, but not the implementation.
Before this commit, do this:
c.maximize_hoizontal = true
c.maximize = true
c.maximize = false
assert(c.maximize_hoizontal)
Would not work because the states were not preserved individually.
This commit fixes that. Awesome wont be confused about it's own
state anymore.
This may seem pointless, but when it come to undoing these
maximizations, it was ambiguous.
Before 4.0, maximizing could only be done in 2 operations.
4.0 add an unified way, but kept doing 2 operations. The old
Lua EWMH code to serialize the 2 operations was dropped when
the codepath was simplified and replaced by a generic version
in awful.placement. However this version never implemented
combining multiple mementos into 1.
This commit unify the maximize C code, drop the ugly macro
template and actually fixes a couple more issues that were
caused because request::geometry was sent twice.
There is already a way to prevent them from moving them, but the
next few commits will remove it. There is no reasons to handle
this differently from fullscreen clients.
The functions awful.client.shape.update.bounding and .clip handle both
the client's shape and the shape set by Lua. However,
awful.client.shape.update.all only handles the shape set by Lua and
ignores the client's own shape. This can easily be noticed with xeyes.
When update.all ran last and you move around xeyes, the wallpaper behind
it is moved along, because it is not actually outside of the window.
Fix this by partly reverting 1a5f6b7ad2 and having update.all just
call the other two functions again.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
In theory it would be enough to only update the old and new screen of
the tag whose screen changed. However, we cannot easily get the old
screen, so just update all layoutboxes.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1503
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Commit c50d62749b added an empty table as a default theme. However,
when loading the actual theme fails, we will end up with theme having
value nil. This commit fixes this by reverting back to an empty table.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1417
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This removes some @EXPANSIONS@ from Lua files and removes a hack that
was needed. All is better now! :-)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Also save some boilerplate code.
This closes the gap between timer.start_new and timer.new. Now the
only difference is that one have a special callback format while
the other only has predefined properties.
When menubar.refresh() is called, it tries to update the menubar widget.
The call chain looks like this: menulist_update -> common.list_update ->
get_current_page. get_current_page then tries to query information about
the size of the menubar.
Since there is not much point in this, just skip the whole callback in
this case.
Side note: What is the point of menubar.get()? It seems quite useless to
me.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This bridges between gears.shape and the shapes. So far, it does not try
to do any kind of anti-aliasing magic, so you get "steep edges".
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Up to now, a drawable always figured out the screen that it is on by
looking at its position. This causes memleak-like problems with wibars:
A wibar has a screen assigned, but its underlying drawable will end up
referring to another screen. Via this, we were managing to build a long
reference chain of screens and drawable that meant that none of the fake
screens that our test suite added could be garbage collected.
To fix this, add wibox.drawable._force_screen(s). After this function is
called, the normal screen detection based on the position is skipped and
instead the given screen is always used. This breaks the above reference
chain and things become garbage-collectable.
Also, this chains the drawable to the life time of the screen: When the
screen becomes invalid (.valid == false), the drawable will stop
redrawing.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1237
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
actionless
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
copycat-killer
Jonathan McCrohan
Uli Schlachter
Uli Schlachter
getzze
Kevin Zander
Holger Schurig
Daniel Hahler
Alexander Gehrke
Daniel Hahler
SammysHP
rob