In Gtk 2, the "first" argument to set_geometry_hints() is not optional.
However, this code does not provide any argument here. Improve the error
message in this case by checking for Gtk 3.
Reference: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1495
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This allows for `DO_COVERAGE=1 make check` with local tests (where
`CI=true` is not given).
It uses the new environment variables to configure the default theme,
instead of creating a temporary config/theme.
- Execute the tests without compiling, and don't mess with the source
files when coverage is enabled.
This ensures that the coverage report lines are correct.
This disables the doc tests, as their results would be unused.
Hack: it still expands macros on util.lua, because of
`util.get_themes_dir()` and `util.get_awesome_icon_dir()`, which might
be moved later. Ref:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/1239#discussion_r93828178.
- ensure that BUILD_APIDOC and DO_COVERAGE are not used together
- awesomeConfig.cmake: add DO_COVERAGE as an option
- Travis: only install codecov with DO_COVERAGE=codecov
- Travis: do not use set -v; use set -x with DO_COVERAGE
- do not use trailing slashes with dirs in tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt / .luacov
- Use latest luacov (0.12.0-1) again
This reverts parts of 4cc6a815.
I think it is better to fix any failure that 4cc6a815 tried to work around.
- Travis: simplify/fix require('luacov') for functionaltests
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: resolve ../.. in SOURCE_DIR
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: add DO_COVERAGE to env
- Cleanup/simplify .luacov: work with SOURCE_DIRECTORY alone
- tests/run.sh: pass through / set SOURCE_DIRECTORY when running awesome
- tests/run.sh: resolve source_dir
- use DO_COVERAGE from env only
X11 does not allow to resize a window to size 0x0. Also, there are some
possibilities of integer overflows in our case. We tried to handle this
already, but there was a loop-hole: If the too-small-value is only
produced after applying size hints, then this was not caught.
Fix this by applying size hints before checking if the resulting size is
valid. However, this means some check needs to be duplicated to handle
the possibility of integer underflows while applying size hints.
Helps-with: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1340
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This adds a new argument to the test client spawning function that will
make the test client window set a resize increment property.
The API here is starting to a bit ugly, but since this is not any user
facing API, that should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Otherwise commented lines look like ---- My comment
instead of -- -- My comment. This wasn't a problem before the
intentation fix commit, but it is now.
Commit a944636c02 "bashified" tests/run.sh for some reason.
Afterwards, commit 4abd820051 fixed some of the fall-out.
However, there is still a problem left.
We have "set -e" in this script. Thus, whenever some command exits with
status 0, the script abort. When the variable errors is zero/unset, the
command "((errors++))" has exit status zero. Thus, this instruction
caused the shell script to abort. This was not intended.
Fix this by using "((++errors))" instead.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Before this, the test runner used a timer which fired every 0.1 seconds
to "do its thing". Many of these waits seem unnecessary.
This commit makes the test runner wait 0 seconds for the first call of a
step function. Only following calls will have a timeout of 0.1 seconds
applied.
A full run of the test suite (tests/run.sh without further arguments)
took about 100 seconds before this change. After this change, we are
down to 60 seconds. This is almost factor two faster! (Well, five thirds
is the exact number, so factor 1.66)
(The numbers are best out of three runs. The "before" number is rounded
down while the "after" number is rounded up.)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Previously we got the following unhelpful error message:
tests/_client.lua:98: bad argument #2 to 'assert' (string expected, got
userdata)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This uses DOC_HIDE magic in the actual test code, except for the
template.lua files which do not have it.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The following commits will add DOC_HIDE uses that are not at the end of
the line, but the beginning. Hence, drop the requirement that it appears
at the end of the line and change the ".+" at the beginning into ".*".
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Copy-paste-y I was checking for the wrong result. Another unrelated
problem with the test runner caused me to miss this. Sorry!
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This removes a duplicate test and moves some "spawn with empty string as
argument" up to the long list of similar tests (and adds error
checking).
I do not see the point of the assert(#client.get() == 0) and so it was
just dropped.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
actionless
copycat-killer
Daniel Hahler
Uli Schlachter
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
SammysHP
Daniel Hahler
Uli Schlachter