When menubar.refresh() is called, it tries to update the menubar widget.
The call chain looks like this: menulist_update -> common.list_update ->
get_current_page. get_current_page then tries to query information about
the size of the menubar.
Since there is not much point in this, just skip the whole callback in
this case.
Side note: What is the point of menubar.get()? It seems quite useless to
me.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This bridges between gears.shape and the shapes. So far, it does not try
to do any kind of anti-aliasing magic, so you get "steep edges".
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Up to now, a drawable always figured out the screen that it is on by
looking at its position. This causes memleak-like problems with wibars:
A wibar has a screen assigned, but its underlying drawable will end up
referring to another screen. Via this, we were managing to build a long
reference chain of screens and drawable that meant that none of the fake
screens that our test suite added could be garbage collected.
To fix this, add wibox.drawable._force_screen(s). After this function is
called, the normal screen detection based on the position is skipped and
instead the given screen is always used. This breaks the above reference
chain and things become garbage-collectable.
Also, this chains the drawable to the life time of the screen: When the
screen becomes invalid (.valid == false), the drawable will stop
redrawing.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1237
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commit doesn't add any useful documentation, but adds
previously hidden documentation variables. It can be the basis
of a better layout documentation.
Fix#1246
The function that is documented as awful.wibox.stretch is deprecated,
because it was removed (that's not a deprecation, is it?!?). For the
replacement, we used "@see stretch". However, LDoc was randomly
resolving this reference to awful.wibar.stretch (good) or
awful.wibox.stretch (bad; the see points to the element where it
appears).
Fix this by spelling out the "full name" of the function in the @see.
Related-to: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/834
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The only other swap function is awful.tag.swap and that one is
deprecated. Thus, it should not be linked to.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
People who use a plain "make install" to install awesome will likely
also use the same approach to update their installation. However, this
does not actually work, because in awesome 3.5 there are beautiful.lua
and naughty.lua. These modules have since been split up into multiple
files and we now have beauitful/init.lua and naughty/init.lua instead.
The result is that the newer awesome will use some code from an older
version of awesome.
This commit has a work-around for this: We add "empty" beautiful.lua and
naughty.lua files whose only purpose is to load the real file. These
"empty" files will then overwrite files from an older installation and
everything works.
Sadly, this bad hack will have to be kept around forever and in the
future we will only have more instances of it. I would like to just say
people to fix their system, but apparently this should be worked around
instead.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/244
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Previously, the API to set the data that should be displayed was
:set_data(t) where t is a table. This table has the labels to use as its
keys and the numbers as its values. With this API, it was not possible
to influence the order in which the "pie pieces" were drawn.
This commit adds and uses a new API called :set_data_list(t). Here, t is
a table with integer keys and tables as values, thus one can iterate
over this with ipairs() and the order is well-defined. The tables used
as values contain the label as their first entry and the number as their
second entry.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1249
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Spawn callbacks were never invoked when no startup-notification-rules were
given. This commit fixes the code so that "startup done" callbacks are also
called when no rules were given.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1218
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The usual "a or b"-trick to simulate C's ?:-operator does not work when
"false" is a valid value. Fix the code to handle this correctly and add
a short unit test which would have caught this problem.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
We already have a variant of this function for transforming an actual
matrix. This adds the corresponding static factory.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of doing Linux-specific magic with error codes and trying to
read the first byte of a file, just use Gio to check if a file exists
and is readable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When adding callbacks as a `callback` entry in a property, the callback
is run by `awful.rules`, because it does `c.callback =
result_of_function`. This is obviously not intended. Also, this causes
the callbacks to run twice, because the code already handled this
`callback` property specially.
Fix this by just not merging callbacks with the normal rules at all.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1159
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
For some reason, the code here tried to handle widget::redraw_needed
signals even though it should apparently/obviously only produce a
current snapshot of the widget's look.
Fix this by just removing the redraw code.
While here, also factor out the widget context table into a local
variable and re-use it for the initial layout and for the later draw.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When awesome calls any Lua code, it does so with a protected call. This
means that any kind of Lua error should (there are exceptions) just
result in an error message being printed and everything continuing as
usual. When LGI calls Lua code, it uses a normal call. This means that
in an asynchronous context, that is, when there is no more call
generated by awesome's C code on the call stack, we must be careful,
since any error results in Awesome's unprotected error handler to be
called which restarts the WM.
menubar.utils.parse_dir() asynchronously parses a directory containing
.desktop files. This means that it is no longer in a protected call
context. Let's assume that the code itself is fine. However, the
callback that the caller provided for handling the results can be quite
arbitrary. Make sure that it is run in a protected context.
Helps-with: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1173
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It does not provide much value. The version number is already known to
ldoc globally in the "description" variable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of using magic with a weak table, the code now saves this data
as a property under the tag object. This avoids all kinds of leaks, for
example caused by t.foo = t.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of using magic with a weak table, the code now saves this cache
as a property under the tag object.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of using a weak table to save the last mouse position, this is
now saved directly as a property under the screen.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of using a weak table with some magic to save properties of a
client, the code now uses the c.data table provided by the C code
instead.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of having an extra weak table to save a boolean per client, this
now sets a property directly on the client.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
No idea what self referencing loops this refers to. Lua 5.1's and
LuaJIT's garbage collector both should handle cycles just fine. Things
only start getting complicated when you start using weak tables.
Unless someone comes up with an example where this patch causes a leak,
let's remove the weak table magic.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Matrix operations are hard. Apparently I always keep confusing the order
that transformations are applied in the matrix resulting from a matrix
multiplication.
This commit fixes things in wibox.hierarchy that were wrong due to the
wrong order and changes a unit test so that it would now catch the
breakage (and makes sure that it does not happen again).
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of matrix_to_device and matrix_to_parent, this now provides the
full hierarchy instance managing the current widget.
In addition to x, y, width and height (which are an over-approximation
of the widget's extents on the drawable), this now also provides
widget_width and widget_height in the widget's local coordinate system.
These last two values are exact.
For example, the tooltip needs x/y/width/height while a widget that
wants to figure out which point on it was hit with a mouse press will
need widget_width and widget_height (together with the position argument
that is passed in with mouse::press).
I don't know how to document the return type of this function properly.
Hopefully just describing the structure of the resulting table is good
enough.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Similar to the previous commit, this makes the drawable not apply a
pending relayout while it is not visible. When it becomes visible again,
the relayout is done.
The hope here is that less work is done while a drawable is not visible,
saving CPU time.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
LGI does not protect against use-after-free issues that can occur due to
using an object after finalisation. This manifests itself as occasional
crashes on Travis in cairo_region_union_rectangle() (AFAIK no one ran
into this issue in real-world usage).
Since visible drawables are always strongly reachable, the issue can
only occur with invisible drawables. The previous commit made sure that
those are fully repainted when they become visible, so we can just
ignore redraws for those and fix the crash issue.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of tracking all drawables that are alive, the code now only
tracks visible drawables. When a drawable is made visible it is
completely repainted. This should not cause a difference when a wibox is
initially made visible, because it has to be redrawn anyway. However,
this introduces a full repaint when a wibox is hidden and then made
visible again.
Thanks to this change, we can stop using weak tables. Visible drawables
cannot be collected and so we can keep a strong reference to them. This
allows us to get rid of the weak tables which solves various problems
involving finalizers and using objects after finalisation.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Yauhen Kirylau
Kevin Zander
Daniel Hahler
rob
Daniel Hahler
Uli Schlachter
Uli Schlachter
Michael Beaumont
MoreThanOneAnimal
Haochen Tong