Layouts work with the client's geometry in "space on screen that is
assigned to this client". This means that the geometry should include
decoration (titlebar and borders) and useless gaps.
Everything else (especially the C code) works with client's geometry in
"space that the client can draw on". This means that the titlebar,
borders and the useless gaps are not included into this size.
Thus, when applying size hints, the tile layout has to convert between
these two representations. Otherwise, size hints are applied incorrectly
and to a wrong geometry.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1418
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The magnifier layout handles the currently focused client specially.
However, if the currently floating client is floating, it should not be
handled by the layout at all. A bug caused the magnifier layout to
handle a focused and floating client anyway if it was the only tiled
client.
Fix this by removing the '#cls > 0'-case. If #cls == 0, then no client
is available to be managed. Thus, cls[1] will be nil, which is fine
since, well, no client is available to be managed. This only made a
difference in the specific bug that I described above. Thus, drop this
case.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2045
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When gap_single_client is set to 'false', no gap is used when only one
client is shown in a tag. Since the max layout only ever shows one
client at a time it makes sense to apply this setting for this layout
regardless of the actual number of clients in that tag.
Additionally, if the 'master_fill_policy' property is set to
'master_width_factor', then use a gap even if there is only one client
visible and 'gap_single_client' is false.
If an error occurs while a layout is being applied, arrange_lock could
get stuck at true, meaning that no more re-arranges will happen, thus
breaking the whole layout machinery.
Such errors could happen because the layout itself produces an error,
but also because a width is too large and c:geometry() throws an error.
Thus, this commit moves all of the actual "apply a layout"-code into a
protected context.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1853
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Just re-arranging on every focus change would cause useless/needless
re-arranges (which have no effect except to waste CPU time). Thus, this
adds a special (undocumented) flag on layouts that makes sure that a
rearrange occurs when the focus changes.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1799
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commit doesn't add any useful documentation, but adds
previously hidden documentation variables. It can be the basis
of a better layout documentation.
Fix#1246
It does not provide much value. The version number is already known to
ldoc globally in the "description" variable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The magnifier layout wants to ignore floating clients. Before 82342f0 this was
done by calling awful.client.floating.get(focus). If "focus" was nil, this might
have checked the floating status of a wrong client (if some other client was
focused, and the code in magnifier set focus=nil before). This issue can easily
be missed and might exist since forever. After 82342f, floating status is
checked via "focus.floating" and this now causes an "attempt to index nil value"
error instead. Much easier to notice.
Fix this by adding the missing nil check and while touching the code, merge this
with the previous "if" and correct another error (the wrong thing happened if we
had #cls=0).
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1103
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Reported on IRC. I am not sure why swap() is not enough, but the
old code removed before the mouse refactor did this, so apparently
it is necessary.
The fix has been reported to work by spyroboy on IRC, thanks!
The requirement to call add_signal() was added to catch typos. However, this
requirement became increasingly annoying with property::<name> signals and e.g.
gears.object allowing arbitrary properties to be changed.
All of this ended up in a single commit because tests/examples fails if I first
let add_signal() emit a deprecation warning.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
to reproduce:
1) spawn an xterm
2) enter 'sleep 10 && killall xterm'
3) start moving the terminal
There will be an error
(found by a yet to be commited integration test)
If a screen is removed while a re-layout is pending, previously this code would
cause errors and problems. Since the screen is gone, there is nothing to arrange
anyway and we can just not do anything.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Any signal on a screen instance is also emitted on the screen class, so the here
can just connect to the screen class.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
There seem to be a little race condition (either in my layout code or
elsewhere) when playing with multiple screens. As most properties do
not depend on the tag, there is no point in returning early anyway.
Because all our Lua code can now work with screen objects, most of the uses of
s.index that the previous patches added for reaching this goal can be removed
again.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commits makes a random selection of modules in awful support screen objects
and accept them as parameters everywhere where a screen index is accepted.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
awful.layout.suit.corner does awful.tag.getmfpol(t), but doesn't actually have a
variable t in scope. I just copied the needed stuff from the tile layout.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Uli Schlachter
Jan Larres
Uli Schlachter
Kevin Zander
SammysHP
Daniel Hahler
Akulen