Several themes use `dpi(2)` which is quite thick, and it is better to
use the default of 0 here, instead of `beautiful.border_width`, which is
meant for borders on clients.
I am not sure what exactly goes on in the below bug report, so this will
just paper over the problem. I still think that this patch is a good
idea even when it is not a proper fix, since keyboard layouts are
complicated and so this code should be robust and hard to break.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1933
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When gap_single_client is set to 'false', no gap is used when only one
client is shown in a tag. Since the max layout only ever shows one
client at a time it makes sense to apply this setting for this layout
regardless of the actual number of clients in that tag.
Additionally, if the 'master_fill_policy' property is set to
'master_width_factor', then use a gap even if there is only one client
visible and 'gap_single_client' is false.
There were multiple things which stood out to me, as I was trying to setup a simple calendar popup for my textclock:
1.: The functions in https://awesomewm.org/doc/api/classes/awful.widget.calendar_popup.html#Functions were not named correctly (calendar vs calendar_popup) which (naturally) produced an error when used as awful.widget.calendar.month() .
2.: The example for calendar_popup.month() was obviously missing a line (where does the month_calendar come from?) . Resolved by copying the line from the attach-example
3.: The same examples also only refer to the function as calendar.month() which should be changed to awful.widget.calendar_popup.month()
This now runs parse_desktop_file in a protected context so that a single
broken desktop file does not break the whole menubar.
Also, the error message that is produced when a Lua error occurs now
also includes the file name of the .desktop file which we attempted to
parse. This should help quite a lot in debugging.
Related-to: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1880
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
1. before this patch the "Shift" key(s) to get to Shift-Tab would reset
ncomp already.
2. "Shift-Tab" will come in as "Tab" with mod.Shift typically.
3. cur_pos and ncomp have to get reset in case of going back to the
original entry.
This allows, for example, to imeplement the tag `master_fill_policy`
and simplify the client layouts by not having to hardcode empty
columns and rows in each layouts.
Without this, users would modify the beautiful table directly instead of
the theme. This made a difference for code using beautiful.get() to get
the theme.
Reference: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/1854
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
When awful.tag.new() got a list of layouts shorter than the list of
names, it would previously create tags with nil as their layout. This
commit changes this so that the first layout is repeated if necessary.
Related-to: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1853
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
If an error occurs while a layout is being applied, arrange_lock could
get stuck at true, meaning that no more re-arranges will happen, thus
breaking the whole layout machinery.
Such errors could happen because the layout itself produces an error,
but also because a width is too large and c:geometry() throws an error.
Thus, this commit moves all of the actual "apply a layout"-code into a
protected context.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1853
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Using `beautiful.get()` has the drawback of not supporting theme
variables set from `rc.lua`. It is also used less often than
direct theme access, making it a bit inconsistent with how other
modules behave.
The return value for this function is used as an index in a table and
Lua does not like nil as an index.
The function that actually looks for icons, find_icon_theme() already
falls back to "hicolor" if it does not find anything via the current
theme, so fix this issue by just falling back to "hicolor" here as well.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1819
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
LGI's async support was trying to yield inside a protected call. Lua 5.1
cannot do that. Work around this by reverting to the behaviour before
commit 50cfa6c: Only call the callback in a protected context.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1837
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Daniel Hahler
Crazy Lemon
Uli Schlachter
Tomoya Tabuchi
Uli Schlachter
Jan Larres
mqus
Emmanuel Lepage Vallée
actionless
morethanoneanimal
Daniel Hahler
Tim Roes
Luke Bonham
SammysHP