The fit function is called twice in row.
- The first time it gets the maximum available width, and returns how
much of it it needs (with 0 spacing it would be 477)
- The second time the available width it gets is the same as it returned
last phase (and probably is expected to return the same result again)
The width fit requests is the total width of all widgets together + the
spacing (e.g. if each tag widget is 53 px and spacing is -10 then the
requested width 53 * 9 - 80).
The function tries to first fit all its widgets (the tag numbers) in the
amount of width it received, and only then adds the spacing to it. This
is problematic because in the second phase the widgets need to fit
themselves in the same width they requested earlier minus the spacing
(in case of negative spacing). This is of course impossible and so some
widgets are just not being drawn correctly.
This patch makes fit function take into account the spacing while
placing the widgets and not afterwards.
Also add unit-testing that test the bug described.
Signed-off-by: Shay Agroskin <agrosshay@gmail.com>
The function has several expressions of the form
if self._private.dir == "y" then
This patch stores the result of
self._private.dir == "y"
to avoid code duplication.
Also remove the 'used_in_dir' and 'in_dir' variables since their values
can be calculated using other variables in the function and updating
them individually is error prone.
This patch doesn't do any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Shay Agroskin <agrosshay@gmail.com>
There seem to be two issues here. First, the if-statement at the
beginning of the function will return prematurely if
`self._private.widgets[index]` exists. There seems to be a
missing `not` there.
Second, index 1 is interpreted as the top of the stack (although the
documentation says otherwise), but the widget is inserted at the end of
`self._private.widgets`, so it gets pushed to the bottom
instead of the top.
When less space is available than was asked, systray:draw() has to
compute the right base size so that all the icons fit into the available
space. This computation so far ignored the icon spacing, resulting in a
too large base size.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2981
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Just like clients and other CAPI classes, it is now possible to
connect to all instance signals. There was already a couple of
`request::geometry`, but no way to forward them, so it was
de-facto broken.
The next commit will all class level signals. The current design
is used in widgets, but is a bad fit for wiboxes. They should
behave more like client. In v5, setting methods on `wibox` directly
will be deprecated. `wibox.object` is already supported. I don't
think anyone really do that anyway and isn't documented.
The default `rc.lua` was using the focus/unfocus signals to set
the border color along with `awful.rules`. This logic block was
no longer aligned with the rest of `rc.lua` since it was
the only place where `beautiful` variables where only used by
`rc.lua`.
On top of this, the new request handler also has extra contexts
for the urgent and floating/maximixed use cases. So it can be used
by themes to implement much smarter borders than just focus based
ones. They were previously limited by the fact most of the
(un-monkey-patchable) logic was in `rc.lua`.
Note that this commit also shuffle the awful.rules order between
the titlebar and the border and changes the tests accordignly.
After some consideration, I came to the conclusion the previous
behavior was bogus and the fact that the placement tests required
to know about the titlebar height is simply a proof of that. The
change was required in this commit because since the border is no
longer in the default rules, a new buggy edge case surfaced.
Commit f025409 avoided negative dimensions but
also stopped allowing width and height to be zero.
For widgets like awful.widget.watch it is reasonable
to allow dimensions to be zero because in many cases when
the margin container is being calculated the watch widget is
still computing and therefore has width and height zero.
This hass the following tags:
* @interface
* @tparam
* @propbeautiful
* @propemits
* @renamedin
Beside tags, it adds some comments, fix formatting and add
new lines and dots where they belong.
Also add some signals to standardize everything.
This hass the following tags:
* @interface
* @tparam
* @propbeautiful
* @propemits
* @renamedin
Beside tags, it adds some comments, fix formatting and add
new lines and dots where they belong.
Also add some signals to standardize everything.
* Add the ldoc stop marker `.` to each functions, properties and methods definition ;
* Improve a little summaries ;
* Improve properties vs access methods documentation ;
* Change all documented parameters and return values to typed values.
* Add a better descrition for the `imagebox` role in the wiboxes system ;
* Improve image + code render and integration into the descrition ;
* Add a second code exemple to show both coding style (imperative and declarative).
I think the user can now have a better overview of what's a `wibox.widget.imagebox` and how to use it.
get_children's return value should not be called "The". That was a
mistake because ldoc requires a name for return values and parameters.
If a name isn't provided, it thinks the first word of the description
is the name.
* Add format docs to the constructor.
* Add timezone docs to the property.
* Give the argument to set_refresh a name other than "How".
* Fix bug in constructor argument "format" rendering.
Having the new object layout will be important soon when the
append/remove methods start to get added to the client and the
reborn `awful.keyboard` module.
This function is not documented to handle userdata, but historically it
would just pass all arguments to gears.surface.load(), which interpreted
userdata as cairo surfaces. After 3295e9f33d, userdata
objects are restricted.
Accept userdata objects again by explicitly passing them to
gears.surface.load().
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2903
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This is done now because a lot of code in `lib/` add buttons by manually
extracting buttons from awful.button. Instead of adding ugly code to
prevent using the legacy API, do this.
Now always call both check_widget and make_widget_from_value. This
should make it a lot less confusing when randomly trying to create
a widget as all ways to do it slowly converge toward an unified
one.
This doesn't mean removing all screens is supported. It isn't and never
will be. The only reason this commit exist is to allow some
initialization and error handling code to be tested.
The way background are rendered changed to accomodate issues regarding
cliping and border. However this broke the documentation examples.
This commit fixes this in the least hacky way I found.
Fixes#2727
Cairo's save/restore methods handle all properties except for the
current path. The path is just left as-is.
A widget's draw method could create some path without consuming it. This
path would then interfere with random things later which did not expect
a path to already exist.
This commits adds calls to cairo_new_path() in the relevant positions to
clean things up.
This not only applies to a widget's draw method, but also
{before,after}_draw_{child,children}. However, these methods could (for
whatever reason) create paths that are to be consumed in one of the
other methods. To keep this working, the path is only cleared after all
of these methods ran.
I do not expect this commit to break anything, because a widget cannot
really assume much about what widget is drawn after it. Especially so,
because partial redraws could mean that some later widget is skipped and
not redrawn.
This should fix the issue reported at
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/2804.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Shay Agroskin
Lucas Schwiderski
Unai
Uli Schlachter
PlayerNameHere
James Reed
Rob Hoelz
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
erik-f
Aire-One
Jordan Christiansen
mergify[bot]
Uli Schlachter