In theory it would be enough to only update the old and new screen of
the tag whose screen changed. However, we cannot easily get the old
screen, so just update all layoutboxes.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1503
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It does not provide much value. The version number is already known to
ldoc globally in the "description" variable.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Apparently, there is such thing as not leaking enough...
Also try to clear the widgets from mywibox. This seem to help.
Time will tell.
Fixes#914, unfixes #808
This commit changes some tables that are used for per-screen stuff to have weak
keys, so that the screens can be garbage-collected, if needed.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Because all our Lua code can now work with screen objects, most of the uses of
s.index that the previous patches added for reaching this goal can be removed
again.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of connecting to the needed tag-update-signal again for every layoutbox,
this now just creates a single connection and updates all layoutboxes from here.
A new weak table is used to find the layoutboxes from these callbacks.
Additionally, layoutboxes are now per-screen unique. So even if you try to
create three layoutboxes for screen 1, the code will now always return the same
instance.
This kind-of fixes the leak test for layoutboxes. The problem is that the
default config also creates a layoutbox and adds it to a wibox. Since this is
now the same layoutbox, the test still fails. Just removing the layoutbox-part
from the default config makes this problem go away.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Aire-One
Seth Barberee
Uli Schlachter
Uli Schlachter
Daniel Hahler
Julian Wollrath