Some `+` and `-` were missing because it re-indented the content
based on the first code line. It then truncated whatever was
below.
Pushing this to master because Ubuntu/Z, Debian/Sid and Arch just
upgraded to 4.0 and angry reports are coming in *fast*.
- use `--depth 1` with git-clone for faster checkout/cloning
- use `-B` with git-checkout
> If -B is given, <new_branch> is created if it doesn’t exist;
> otherwise, it is reset. This is the transactional equivalent of
>
> $ git branch -f <branch> [<start point>]
> $ git checkout <branch>
Including <sys/wait.h> is required on FreeBSD for WIFEXITED and another couple
of macros.
This includes sys/types.h and sys/wait.h always as described in waitpid(2).
The README is in the apidoc repo by now, and how this was done here
makes it being removed and added all the time (for the
relevant/boilerplate splitting).
This reverts commit 4f1e502c26.
* luaa.c: Remove useless stack operation
We get package.loaded and immediately throw away the result. That's
pointless, so remove this.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
* Refactor modification of package.path
Awesome adds various entries to package.path during startup. This commit
moves that into a helper function. No functional changes intended. The
only change I did to the code was changing a call to lua_type(L, 2) into
lua_type(L, -1);.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
* Modify package.cpath just like package.path
This adds, for example, paths specified via the --search argument also
to package.cpath.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1248
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
In contrast do dpkg, rpm tracks which package created a directory. No
idea what happens if you remove the package which owns the directory,
but another package still owns files in there. Anyway, this behaviour
produced the following problem:
file /etc/xdg from install of awesome-[snip].x86_64 conflicts with
file from package filesystem-3.2-37.fc24.x86_64
Fix this by telling CPack to exclude these directories from the file
list.
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1234
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This allows for `DO_COVERAGE=1 make check` with local tests (where
`CI=true` is not given).
It uses the new environment variables to configure the default theme,
instead of creating a temporary config/theme.
- checkout previous commit, so the coverage upload uses the current
code
- do not run coverage reports when testing previous commits
- improve failure message: display subject/author/name for each commit
The build files do not get updated on source changes currently anyway
(as a dependency of these targets), and this seems to be a leftover from
when `lua.in` files were used / pre-processing was required?!
- Execute the tests without compiling, and don't mess with the source
files when coverage is enabled.
This ensures that the coverage report lines are correct.
This disables the doc tests, as their results would be unused.
Hack: it still expands macros on util.lua, because of
`util.get_themes_dir()` and `util.get_awesome_icon_dir()`, which might
be moved later. Ref:
https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/1239#discussion_r93828178.
- ensure that BUILD_APIDOC and DO_COVERAGE are not used together
- awesomeConfig.cmake: add DO_COVERAGE as an option
- Travis: only install codecov with DO_COVERAGE=codecov
- Travis: do not use set -v; use set -x with DO_COVERAGE
- do not use trailing slashes with dirs in tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt / .luacov
- Use latest luacov (0.12.0-1) again
This reverts parts of 4cc6a815.
I think it is better to fix any failure that 4cc6a815 tried to work around.
- Travis: simplify/fix require('luacov') for functionaltests
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: resolve ../.. in SOURCE_DIR
- tests/examples/CMakeLists.txt: add DO_COVERAGE to env
- Cleanup/simplify .luacov: work with SOURCE_DIRECTORY alone
- tests/run.sh: pass through / set SOURCE_DIRECTORY when running awesome
- tests/run.sh: resolve source_dir
- use DO_COVERAGE from env only
These warnings might help catching some problems in the future. These
could be asserts, but printing a warning is a lot nicer than dying.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
X11 does not allow to resize a window to size 0x0. Also, there are some
possibilities of integer overflows in our case. We tried to handle this
already, but there was a loop-hole: If the too-small-value is only
produced after applying size hints, then this was not caught.
Fix this by applying size hints before checking if the resulting size is
valid. However, this means some check needs to be duplicated to handle
the possibility of integer underflows while applying size hints.
Helps-with: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/1340
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This adds a new argument to the test client spawning function that will
make the test client window set a resize increment property.
The API here is starting to a bit ugly, but since this is not any user
facing API, that should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
Yauhen Kirylau
Kevin Zander
Daniel Hahler
Renato Botelho
Vitja Makarov
Daniel Hahler
Uli Schlachter
Uli Schlachter
rob
Ingo Bürk