awful.layout.suit.corner does awful.tag.getmfpol(t), but doesn't actually have a
variable t in scope. I just copied the needed stuff from the tile layout.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It is necessary to have it beforehand when creating layout objects
for unselected layouts.
In the current layout system, there is no layout object, but to allow
tabs and dynamic tagging features like ion3, layouts cannot be stateless.
This allow layout "arrange" to be called less often and react on
the cause of the change itself rather than it's consequences
(usually, the "focus" signal).
Previously, the layout were re-arranged everytime the focus changed.
Now, with "raised" and "lowered", it require less "arrange".
"swapped" allow smarted layouts. Currently, swapped cause a full
re-arrange. It re-read the "index" list from scratch and create
a "new" layout. With "swapped", incremental layout changes are
possible.
Fixes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/616
18f6ab1 changed the behavior when resizing floating clients using the
mouse (via modkey + RMB).
Previously, you could initiate the mousegrabber using e.g. "modkey +
RMB", release the key and button, and resize the window using the left
mouse button.
This restores this behavior by canceling the mousegrabbers only if the
cursor was moved, without _any_ mouse button being pressed.
Fixes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/309.
Closes https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/pull/310.
This still does `client.focus = c` by default, but allows to customize
it.
This was initially suggested in #194, but by using `request::activate`
instead, which would not be the same. Therefore a new signal is being
used instead.
Helped-by: Samir Benmendil <samir.benmendil@gmail.com>
In commit 3cbdc2a79f, the argument order for awful.layout.inc was changed
from (layouts, i, s) to (i, s, layouts), so that layouts can become an optional
parameter. However, this change (obviously) breaks user configs.
To hide this breakage, we assume the old argument order if the number i is a
table. This cannot break anything, since the operator "+" will error out on
tables anyway. :-)
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Since commit 52ec0ebd93, layouts should return the geometries to their caller
instead of setting them directly. The caller will also fix up the geometries for
border width.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This patch allows 2 things to be done:
* Write unit test to validate layouts using fake clients and tags
* Query the current layout geometry from another tag
The advantages of the former are clear and simple. Those of the later include:
* Creating a screenshot of another layout
* Display the layout wireframe in the tag list (like KDE2-3, Gnome2)
* Having and 'ALT-tab' like visual popup for tags
This makes the screen objects use our existing infrastructure for implementing
classes and objects with lua instead of hand-rolling an own version.
This results in some small API change: Screen objects no longer have an
add_signal() function and instead this function exists on the parent screen
class.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This helps in cases where you have accidentally cloned an entry from
`layouts`.
Previously, no current index would be found and the function would
silently fail.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Hahler <git@thequod.de>
When an area is split in two, for example horizontally, one of the windows
should have height math.floor(previous height / 2) and the other
math.ceil(previous height / 2), to be certain that no gaps are left between the
windows.
For instance, if the first window has height h and the second window has height
math.floor(h / 2), the height of the third window should be math.ceil(h / 2)
instead of the same as for the second window.
So to compute the size of window n + 1 it’s necessary to remember the size of
window n - 1 as well as that of window n.
Signed-off-by: Fabienne Ducroquet <fabiduc@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>