Given noone understand this code, this will prevent some semi likely
regressions from going unnoticed. The main risk is the shims not
producing the exact same results as the real implementation and
cause different code paths to be taken.
As of this commit, both the "real" and "shim" implementation were given
the same set of tests with print() at every step of next_to. The
resulting log was then checksummed to ensure both are identical.
It also add some properties such as `border_width`, `border_color`
and `preferred_alignments`.
It also fix a documentation bug where the `margin_topleft` was called
`margins_topleft`. To conform to the documentation, both are now valid
but one should be removed the next time the API changes.
Fixes#1978
By passing the geometry, important information used by
awful.placement.next_to were "lost". Given `next_to` supports both
widget position, the mouse and client/wibox relative positioning, it
has to know the object type.
No idea what "If the client has multiple classes" is supposed to refer
to, but this commit gets rid of that reference. Also, this commit
clarifies how to get the class and instance out of xprop.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This removes unused public functions from menubar.utils. This is not an
API break, because these functions were only added in commit
8d34201ec3, which is after v4.2. These new functions became
unused in commit e88f1e8735, not long after they were added.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
It is not possible to distribute 100px to three widgets equally. The
current version of wibox.layout.flex tries to do that anyway, by giving
each widget 33px and leaving one pixel outside of any widget. Thus, if
the widgets e.g. have a common background, this leads to a one pixel gap
in the background.
This patch changes the flex layout so that the extra pixel is assigned
to some widget instead. It does so by basically keeping a sum of
space_per_item for the widgets that was assigned so far. This sum is
rounded and when this leads to rounding, the corresponding child widget
gets an extra pixel.
More precisely, this tracks a pos as before. Widgets get their position
still assigned based on rounding pos. However, this now also remembers
this rounded position for the next iteration of the loop. This allows to
assign the size of widgets based on the difference between the current
and last rounded position.
(Possibly) fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/2461
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Update lib/awful/hotkeys_popup/widget.lua
Update lib/awful/hotkeys_popup/widget.lua
fix(awful: hotkeys_popup): caching issue if showing the same widget instance with and without AwesomeWM hotkeys
doc(awful: hotkeys_popup): extend docstring for args.show_awesome_keys
To happen, both of these races have to be lost by client3
* client2 have to take more time to `:kill()` than client3 take
to be spawned.
* client4 have to start faster than client3
It is very unlikely to happen on normal systems, but on server it
happens. Some factor that may or may not be involved
* The scheduler assigned client2 on a very busy CPU and client 3
on a CPU still busy while some other CPUs are idle
* Linux is bad at scheduling hyper-threading
* The system is NUMA and the memory bandwidth is lacking on a core
* There is some "Z" memory compression or drive based swap
* Extreme bad luck
Fix#2424
When calling join with e.g. arguments (nil, {"a"}), then everything past
the nil was ignored, because the code internally used ipairs() to
iterate over the arguments and this stops at the first nil it
encounters.
Fix this by using select() to iterate over the arguments.
This also adds a unit test for this problem.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
In the earlier revision of the keygrabber PR, there was a `release_key`
and it was suggested to rename it `stop_key`. However its sibling
`release_event` wasn't, so it is now confusing.
The commit adds a mild deprecation codepath to avoid breaking configs
based on git-master. However it isn't a "long term" deprecation notice
and the code can probably be removed in 5.0 without further delay.
Emmanuel Lepage Vallee
mergify[bot]
Yauhen Kirylau
Peter Nerlich
legion151
Uli Schlachter
Michele Lazzeri
Sergey Vlasov
Julien Danjou
tototest99
Aire-One
Daniel Hahler
Uli Schlachter